When did we become afraid to ask what the artist actually created? By Alejandro E. Trimper Several years ago, I was at a pop-up exhibition called SPRING/BREAK Art Show in New York City when something rather wonderful happened. Someone had left a pair of eyeglasses on the floor beneath a narrow, empty section of wall. No wall tag, nothing that would indicate they were part of the exhibition, but they were also positioned convincingly enough that people began to gather around them. And then the analysis started. People discussed the placement of the glasses, their relationship to the empty wall, the color, the symbolism of vision, what the artist might have been saying about perception and absence, perhaps even our inability to see what is directly in front of us. Very quickly, it became the focus of everyone in the room. There was only one problem. It wasn’t art. By accident, someone had been sitting there and forgotten their glasses. Eventually, the owner came back and quic...
What a Certificate of Authenticity Should Actually Tell You A buyer’s guide to evaluating the document, the process behind it, and the right questions to ask before you buy. by Alejandro E Trimper Not long ago, in an essay on Collecting Keith Haring's subway drawings published in Incollect Magazine, I made what I thought was a passing observation: a Certificate of Authenticity should not be treated as proof simply because it uses the word "certificate" . That sentence did quiet work in my inbox. Collectors wrote asking what their own certificates were actually worth. Dealers wrote asking where I drew the line between seller documentation and authentication. Galleries wrote about how often serious documentation gets reduced to a single piece of paper. New buyers, more than anyone, asked the simplest and most important question of all: how do I know what I am holding? I'll preface this by saying YES, I know some of this will be repetitive. It's not because I like ...